France[ edit ] Abolition in continental France [ edit ] InLouis Xking of France, published a decree proclaiming that "France signifies freedom" and that any slave setting foot on the French ground should be freed. This prompted subsequent governments to circumscribe slavery in the overseas colonies.
This understanding of the word slave did not denote an entire lifetime of slavery but merely was used to describe a person who was in a position similar of that to a servant or ward.
In the European society at this time, the term slave was used to describe a human who was reduced to the status of being property to another human being. When the Trans-Atlantic slave trade came to be abolished in the 19th century, the economic, social and political landscapes were very different than they had been leading into the Trans-Atlantic slave trade.
There are historians who have tried to make a case for economic factors being the largest contributor to the end of the slave trade, but it was the total summary of social, political and economical aspects which led to the eventual abolition of the Trans-Atlantic slave trade.
The politics of the abolition of the slave trade were diverse and complex. Abolitionist efforts were taking place on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean, with abolitionists working to change laws both in Europe and the United States of America. The first attempt to abolish slavery was the British Act of Coming shortly after the period of the Haitian Revolution, it would not be hard to say that one led to the other.
It also convinced religiously motivated whites that only peaceful emancipation could prevent more bloodshed in the abolition of slavery. Having vied for the abolition of the slave trade for almost eighteen years prior to this, the Act of was a large accomplishment for British abolitionists.
Jefferson went on to announce that no law prohibiting the slave trade could take effect untilwhich prompted Senator Bradley of Vermont to push a bill through the Senate detailing how to abolish the slave trade.
Despite the lenient attitudes that were present in the United States, public opinion was slowly forcing politicians to stand up against the slave trade. The 19th century was a volatile century in regards to the abolition of the slave trade in both the United States and in Europe.
When it came to looking at the United States, politics were quickly changing to accommodate the abolitionists. Although attitudes were changing towards the abolition of the slave trade, in the beginning of the 19th century, it was still commonplace for people to consider slaves to be a necessary evil in society.
However, it took decades before that became a majority opinion in the United States. Abolitionists in Europe, more specifically in Britain, were quickly pushing the public to hold politicians accountable for the abolition of the slave trade.
In Prime Minister William Pitt became sympathetic to politicizing the subject of the abolition of the slave trade. The most common topic of these petitions was the slave trade. Between anda total of 1, petitions were sent to Parliament. The public was called upon to sign these petitions and the majority of these were in favor of abolishing the slave trade.
The industrial revolution would soon contribute to the speed of the antislavery movement, both in Europe and the United States, with the economics of slavery changing. As items were being produced through quicker, less expensive manufacturing methods, the idea of using plantations and slavery- especially in regards to sugar, was becoming a thing of the past.
From a social point of view, the abolition of the slave trade was quickly gaining public support in Britain. The first human rights movements were being spawned and entire societies formed that were dedicated to the equal and fair treatment of every individual, regardless of their origins or skin color.
The public was beginning to ask how a nation that called itself a Christian nation could engage in a trade where people were dehumanized and mistreated as a means to gain profit. The Enlightenment was beginning in the middle of the 19th century, with people searching for answers through religion.
Whereas slavery was a widely accepted ideology prior to the Enlightenment, people were now starting to question the morality of the slave trade and its disregard for basic human rights. Despite this, it cannot be said that the economy was the main contributing factor to the abolition of the slave trade.
The aim was to convince the general public to abstain from the consumption of sugar that was grown on slave plantations. This was seen as an instrument of direct economic coercion against the whole slave interest. ByBritish-controlled territories produced well over half of the sugar reaching Europe, which was largely produced on plantations where slavery existed.
This was up from less than one-third in Stiff penalties were put in place for any person who was caught participating in the slave trade, with amounts ranging from thousand dollars. However, despite this reform, there was still the question of what to do with slaves that had been illegally imported despite the high cost of doing so.
Jefferson was unwilling to have Africans running free in the country, and he was also unwilling to spend the money to send them back to Africa despite the Africans being brought to the United States illegally. Therefore, the law provided that slaves illegally found in the United States would be treated according to the law of the state in which they were found — or brought to.
In practice, this meant they would become slaves in the United States, and that the states would profit by selling them.In this sense, the abolition of the slave trade was a pragmatic decision made in the knowledge that Britain could probably afford to dispense with it.
Yet there is little doubt that public opinion was behind the measure, or that many MPs were swayed by the moral arguments put forward by Wilberforce and his supporters.
Why was Slavery finally abolished in the British Empire? In July , a Bill to abolish slavery throughout the British Empire passed in the House of Commons, followed by the House of Lords on 1st August.
There has been a lot of debate over the factors that contributed to the final success of the bill. Factors Leading to the Abolition of the Slave Trade The Economic, Social and Political Factors of the Abolition of the Slave Trade by Jessica Comeau The Trans-Atlantic slave trade had deep and far-reaching effects on the continent of Africa and its people.
1HaaF1 & 1HaaE1 What led to the abolition of the Slave Trade in ? Political and It is wrong to let this undermine the social and ethical values leading to the abolition as the Economic factors would have aided Political support, which in turn would have been initiated by Social and Ethical values.
Political Factors Political and. Oct 27, · The abolitionist movement was a social and political push for the immediate emancipation of all slaves and the end of racial discrimination and segregation. Advocating for . Factors Leading to the Abolition of the Slave Trade The Trans-Atlantic slave trade had deep and far reaching affects on the continent of Africa and its people.
Prior to the Trans-Atlantic slave trade, there was an active slave trade within Africa, although the connotation of the word slave was not the same for the Africans as it was for the.