Should NASA be abolished? September 21, That alone makes it worth keeping around.
But why bother spending all this money exploring space and finding out there was water on Mars at some point in the last few thousand years we have water in Earth when these same great minds could be applied to finding better ways to power humanity's insatiable desire for energy, to feeding the starving millions around the globe, and generally making life down here better before looking up into the heavens.
It seems the authoritative powers have their heads way, way up in the clouds. The needs of humanity should always come first. While there are people on Earth who need help, they should be helped, rather than seeing money spent on sending robots onto other planets.
Humanity is the number one priority; keeping the human race alive is a necessity. Alternatively, space exploration is a desire. If we put our desires before our needs, then everyone loses out on a better standard of living.
Sure, it's great that NASA can Space exploration should be abolished technology to the next level time and time again, so why not make technology that directly benefits us? And as there are millions round the world who are starving to death, when people spend more and more money on space technology they should realize they are the killers.
Also, why take so much time and money to learn about Mars or any other planet, when we know so little about our own? We should learn more about Earth and the ocean before wasting time and money on Space exploration.
Production of these product leads to redevelopment, sales and distribution - all of which leads to more jobs; somebody has to build, sell, and repair.
One last point, we know that Russia and China have both put men in space and now even more countries are getting involved. Obviously we have seen the power of Google Maps and that is only at the civilian level.
Space Exploration is a waste of resources. Instead of decreasing resources by space travel and such, we must deal with problems on Earth first. Why bother spending all this money on exploring space when we could be helping our own planet that us humans live on. Jan 02, · No space exploration should be permitted without showing that it will not harm extraterrestrial microbial life. On balance, nuclear energy does more good than harm. Organ donation should be compulsory for all United States citizens. Space exploration is a hugely expensive affair. Should we spend money on space exploration when we have so many problems on planet Earth? We debate the pros and cons of space exploration and the reasons for investing in space agencies and programs.
Imagine now, that other powerful countries have satellites to spy on us and can position weapons directly above our country, dont you think it would be a good idea to be abloe to stave that off. If we decided to stop "wasting" money on space programs, we can say goodbye to many new developments that will be out of reach of garage scientist and we can expect to be overwhelmed with visitors in the skies above the US.
There are endless possibilities, ranging from solar energy farms to revolutionary and cheap intercontinental transportation.
Imagine a solar farm, capable of harvesting the solar winds; this translates to an unlimited supply of energy for not just the United States, but the entire world!
The human race is changing, and expanding. Soon, the Earth will simply not be big enough and we need to start considering our future as a species. There are issues that do plague us as a race. There is poverty and injustice in the world.
While these issues exist and should certainly not be ignored, the funds put forth to space exploration have a quantifiable impact and are no less of a priority. These problems will likely not be solved by the evolution of invention and space exploration alone, but as technology improves so will the lives of every man, woman, and child regardless of gender, skin color, or wealth.
Space exploration needs focus and funding, it is representative of our future, and will secure it. Space exploration is arguably the single-most important investment we could possibly make. Space exploration gives us no direct benefit There have been no direct benefits from space travel; the only 'good things' to come from it are indirect, and not the end aims.A lot of people may say that space exploration should be abolished because it is a waste of money, but think of how much we have advanced in our knowledge of space.
Should Space exploration be banned? Of course not! That's silly. Banning space exploration, just because it's not mentioned in the Bible, would be just as ridiculous as banning all antibiotic medicines and disinfection practices because the Bible makes no mention of the Germ theory of disease.
Exploration is in the blood of our species. Its the thing that drives us to go beyond that mountain, to look for riches beyond the oceans, to explore what’s outside our cave. Banning space exploration will be like banning humanity’s noblest venture.
Space exploration is a hugely expensive affair. Should we spend money on space exploration when we have so many problems on planet Earth? We debate the pros and cons of space exploration and the reasons for investing in space agencies and programs. Check out the online debate Space exploration should be banned.
Space Exploration is a waste of resources. Instead of decreasing resources by space travel and such, we must deal with problems on Earth first.
Why bother spending all this money on exploring space when we could be helping our own planet that us humans live on.